TL;DR voor B2B-kopers
- A K number is not enough by itself. Match the FDA record to the applicant, exact device and models, Indicaties voor gebruik, etikettering, and the configuration your brand plans to sell.
- FDA establishment registration and device listing are not 510(k) goedkeuring. FDA does not issue device-registration certificates, and a registration or listing entry does not show that FDA cleared, goedgekeurd, or authorized the device.
- Clearance belongs to a defined device scope—not to a factory, golflengte, vorm, or product code in general. A similar cap, helmet, kam, predicate, of 650 nm specification does not inherit another product’s clearance.
- A distributor may not need its own 510(k) in some unchanged-device arrangements, but the answer depends on the actual manufacturer, importeur, distributeur, labeler, and specification-control roles. Confirm which U.S. distribution or foreign-manufacturer/import route applies, which exact model is supplied, and whether the label, bedoeld gebruik, beweringen, software, accessoires, or design will change.
- A laser device can have a second, parallel FDA compliance track. The applicable laser-product performance standards, radiation product reporting, etikettering, certificering, quality-control records, and import responsibilities do not disappear because a device has a 510(k).
- Before approving U.S. beweringen, verpakking, or an OEM order, save the official database record and PDF, complete the evidence map below, and escalate every mismatch for project-specific regulatory review.
De zin “FDA-cleared hair growth device” is useful only when it can be tied to a verifiable product record. It should not be treated as a general quality badge for every device a supplier makes.
For a U.S.-market brand, distributeur, importeur, or clinic channel, the practical question is not simply, “Does the supplier have FDA?” The useful question is:
Does this FDA record support the exact hair-growth device, etikettering, bedoeld gebruik, beweringen, and configuration we plan to place on the U.S. markt?
This guide shows how to answer that question using FDA sources. It does not rank consumer devices, compare treatment results, or state that any Wakelife hair-growth model is FDA-cleared.
What Does FDA-Cleared Mean for a Hair-Growth Device?
FDA-cleared normally means FDA issued a substantial-equivalence determination for a defined device and submitted use through the 510(k) traject; it does not mean FDA approved or endorsed the product.
De FDA legt uit dat a 510(k) submitter compares a device with one or more legally marketed predicate devices. Before marketing a device that requires 510(k), de indiener moet een FDA-bevel ontvangen waarin wordt vastgesteld dat het apparaat in wezen gelijkwaardig is. Dat bevel maakt het apparaat vrij voor commerciële distributie, subject to the other requirements that still apply.
Four terms should remain separate:
| FDA-termijn | What it shows | Wat het niet laat zien | First buyer action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Establishment registration | A facility completed an applicable FDA registration record | Productopruiming, goedkeuring, autorisatie, or FDA inspection of every product | Verify the legal entity and activity, then continue to the product record |
| Device listing | A device is associated with an establishment in FDA’s listing system | That FDA reviewed and cleared that exact device | Look for an applicable premarket submission number |
| 510(k)-gewist | FDA issued a substantial-equivalence determination for the submitted device and use | FDA-goedkeuring, endorsement, coverage of unrelated models, or freedom to make any claim | Verify the K number and read its scope |
| FDA-goedgekeurd | A different regulatory term associated with an approval pathway, niet gewoon 510(k) goedkeuring | A synonym for “510(k)-cleared” | Gebruik deze bewoording niet voor a 510(k) apparaat |
FDA's registration and listing reminder states that FDA does not issue registration certificates to medical-device facilities and that registration/listing entries do not denote approval, goedkeuring, or authorization. Afzonderlijk, 21 CFR 807.97 says that submitting a 510(k) and receiving a substantial-equivalence determination does not denote official approval.
Kopersregel: use “FDA-cleared” or “510(k)-cleared” only after verifying the exact record. Do not turn “registered,” “vermeld,” “substantially equivalent,” or “cleared” into “approved,” “certified,” or “endorsed.”
Which FDA Record Should You Verify First?
Start with the K number in FDA’s releasable 510(k) database, then open the official PDF; do not begin with a logo, certificate image, verkoop dek, or marketplace listing.
FDA's 510(k) database guide explains that the public database can be searched by K number, productcode, apparaatnaam, or panel. A result can display fields including the device name, aanvrager, productcode, datum besluit, beslissing, and whether a summary is available.
Gebruik deze volgorde:
- Ask for the K number. It normally begins with “K” followed by six digits.
- Search the FDA database. Confirm that the record exists on an fda.gov or accessdata.fda.gov page.
- Check the decision. A received date or submission number alone is not a clearance decision.
- Open the official PDF. Read the decision letter, Indicaties voor gebruik, En 510(k) Summary where available.
- Build a project map. Compare the record with the exact model, label, bedoeld gebruik, beweringen, accessoires, software, and planned changes in your project.
The FDA’s standard OAP medical-device classification page identifies the generic type as “laser, kam, hair” under 21 CFR 890.5500. Its generic definition refers to males with androgenic alopecia in Norwood-Hamilton classes IIa–V. That definition is a classification-level description—not a substitute for the exact Indications for Use in a device’s own clearance file, which must be checked for the submitted model and population.
FDA also maintains a separate OAP radiation-emitting product-code page. That page currently identifies a product radiation-safety report and annual reports as required and lists 21 CFR 1040.10 En 1040.11 as applicable performance standards. The two FDA pages answer different questions: one helps classify the medical device and find its 510(k) route; the other flags the parallel laser-radiation requirements.
What Must You Verify Beyond the 510(k) for a Laser Hair-Growth Device?
For a laser product, 510(k) clearance and electronic-product radiation compliance are parallel evidence tracks; neither replaces the other.
FDA states that laser products used for medical applications must comply with both applicable laser-product requirements and medical-device regulations. The current OAP radiation page lists 21 CFR 1040.10 En 1040.11, a product report, and annual reporting. FDA’s market-entry FAQ says required product reports must be submitted before the product is introduced into U.S. handel. For an imported product, FDA recommends submitting the report at least one month before presenting it for import so that CDRH has time to issue an acknowledgement letter and accession number. An acknowledgement letter or accession number only shows that CDRH received a radiation report; it is not FDA approval and does not establish that the report is adequate.
Laserkennisgeving 56 describes FDA’s enforcement approach for manufacturers using specified provisions of IEC 60825-1 Editie 3 en IEC 60601-2-22 Editie 3.1 that FDA identifies as comparable with parts of its laser performance standards. A generic IEC certificate is therefore not enough by itself. Buyers should map the exact model and configuration to the selected compliance route, laser class, product report or supplement, etiketten, user information, quality-control testing, en VS. import responsibilities.
Kopersregel: ask for the exact-model radiation file separately from the 510(k) file. Do not treat a product-report accession number, laser class label, IEC report, of 510(k) as a substitute for the other evidence layers.
The laser-reporting distinction should not be copied onto every light-based device. FDA's market-entry FAQ states that LEDs and IPL products do not meet its laser definition and currently are not subject to a mandatory FDA performance standard or Product/Annual Reports under 21 CFR-onderdeel 1002. They remain radiation-emitting products subject to applicable general requirements in 21 CFR Parts 1000–1005, including defect and accidental-radiation notifications. Voor kopers, no laser Product Report is a red flag for an applicable laser device; its absence is not, op zichzelf, a gap for an LED-only device.
How Do You Match a 510(k) to the Exact Hair-Growth Device?
| Link to verify | Where to check | Project question | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| K number and decision | FDA database | Does the record exist, and does it show a substantially-equivalent decision? | Only a screenshot, application claim, or registration number is provided |
| Aanvrager | Database and decision letter | Who holds the submission, and what is the supplier’s documented relationship to that party? | The supplier cannot explain the applicant relationship |
| Device name and exact models | Database, DE WOLK, En 510(k) Samenvatting | Is the SKU on your quotation explicitly named or demonstrably the same cleared device? | A different cap, helmet, kam, model suffix, or product family appears |
| Product code and classification | Database and classification page | Is the claimed device category consistent with the record? | The K number belongs to another device category |
| Indicaties voor gebruik | FDA PDF enclosure | Do the planned U.S. bedoeld gebruik, bevolking, behandelgebied, and user type stay within the record? | The marketing plan adds a different hair-loss condition, bevolking, or use |
| Labeling and configuration | Cleared labeling plus controlled project files | Do the manual, waarschuwingen, instructies, accessoires, software, and physical configuration remain consistent? | Packaging or product development proceeds without a documented comparison |
This map separates a valid record from a valid project conclusion. Finding a real K number answers only the first question. A buyer still needs to establish why that record is relevant to the device on the quotation and to the brand’s planned U.S. presentation.
What does not transfer a 510(k)?
None of the following, op zichzelf, transfers clearance from one device to another:
- the same nominal wavelength;
- a similar cap, helmet, headband, or comb shape;
- the same generic product code;
- use of the same predicate;
- production in the same factory;
- a distributor or private-label relationship;
- a model name that resembles a cleared model;
- an applicant’s clearance for another product category.
Each item may be relevant background. None replaces exact-device mapping.
How Does a Real 510(k) Define Exact-Device Scope? Geval: K250830
Sungrow’s K250830 record provides a useful boundary example: an applicant’s successful submission history does not make a different device, model, indication, or configuration FDA-cleared.
De ambtenaar K250830-databaserecord identifies Shenzhen Sungrow LED Technology Co., Ltd. as the applicant and names 13 LED Light Therapy Mask models. De FDA-issued decision letter and Indications for Use define red, geel, and red-plus-infrared modes for full-face wrinkles, and blue and mixed red-blue-infrared modes for mild-to-moderate inflammatory acne.
That is a real SE decision for the 13 named mask models and their defined uses. It is not a clearance of Wakelife as a brand, Sungrow as a company, or the factory’s wider product range, and it does not cover hair-growth devices.
| Scope field | What K250830 establishes | T01-Ultra development configuration | Buyer conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aanvrager / company relationship | Shenzhen Sungrow LED Technologie Co., Ltd. is the applicant of record | Internal development materials identify an unreleased multi-zone VCSEL helmet configuration within the Sungrow/Wakelife product system; no applicant, fabrikant, K-nummer, or FDA decision is yet confirmed for that configuration | A commercial product-system relationship is relevant background, not model-level clearance |
| Exact model scope | 13 named LED Light Therapy Mask models | T01-Ultra is not one of the named models | T01-Ultra cannot be described as “under K250830” |
| Vormfactor | Gezicht, nek/borst, and related mask models named in the record | Unreleased helmet-format device | A different form factor requires its own documented regulatory mapping |
| Indicaties voor gebruik | Full-face wrinkles and mild-to-moderate inflammatory acne, depending on mode | No FDA-issued T01-Ultra Indications for Use have been identified | Do not transfer mask indications—or add hair-growth indications—to T01-Ultra |
| Product configuration | The official record applies to the cleared mask family and controlled labeling | An unreleased multi-zone VCSEL helmet configuration is under development; finished-device verification is pending | A development configuration does not prove final output, goedkeuring, clinical performance, laser class, or labeling scope |
| FDA decision | Substantially Equivalent on June 9, 2025 | No T01-Ultra K number or FDA decision is identified in the current materials | Treat T01-Ultra clearance as unverified until an exact official record exists |
This comparison produces two practical rules:
- Use K250830 to demonstrate that Sungrow has a traceable successful 510(k) submission history; the clearance itself remains limited to the 13 named mask models and their defined uses.
- Build the T01-Ultra evidence file independently. Its wavelength, aantal emitters, irradiance method, veiligheidscontroles, bedoeld gebruik, etikettering, and exact model family must connect to its own controlled documentation and any future official record.
HC03 now provides a live product connection within this workflow. Buyers can review the HC03 silicone VCSEL laser cap product page and its detailed sourcing guide to assess the published configuration, sample questions, and document checks. These pages support product discovery and due diligence; they do not establish 510(k) goedkeuring. As of this article’s review date, no exact HC03 510(k) record has been identified, and K250830 does not cover HC03.
Can a Private-Label Brand Rely on a Manufacturer’s 510(k)?
A distributor may be able to market an unchanged manufacturer’s device under its own company name without submitting its own 510(k), but the applicable route and responsibilities differ for domestic distribution and foreign-manufacturer/import arrangements; “private label” alone is not the answer.
FDA's 510(k) Veelgestelde vragen says that when a distributor markets a manufacturer’s product under its own company name, the manufacturer submits the 510(k), if one is required for the device. It also points to label wording such as “Manufactured for” of “Distributed by” when the named firm is not the manufacturer. FDA’s broader Premarket-melding 510(k) page separately describes a domestic distributor of another firm’s U.S.-made device and an importer of a foreign device whose foreign manufacturer already holds the applicable clearance. The same page says most repackagers or relabelers do not need a new 510(k) when they do not significantly change the existing labeling or device condition and the labeling remains consistent with the cleared indications, waarschuwingen, and contraindications.
That does not support a blanket “yes” for every OEM or private-label project. First classify the role and changes:
| Project situation | Default buyer interpretation | What to verify before launch |
|---|---|---|
| Unchanged cleared device; distributor name added accurately | The distributor may not need its own 510(k), but the domestic-distribution or foreign-manufacturer/import route must be identified | Manufacturer/holder/importer/distributor relationship, exacte model, qualified label wording, listing/registration responsibilities, klachtenafhandeling, current labeling |
| Brand changes marketing claims or intended use | Do not assume the manufacturer’s clearance still supports the project | Claim-to-IFU mapping and documented regulatory assessment |
| Brand changes warnings, contra-indicaties, instructies, or treatment protocol | Escalate before approval | Controlled labeling comparison and change rationale |
| Brand specifies new hardware, light-source arrangement, software, accessoire, materiaal, voedingssysteem, or manufacturing change | Treat as a device-change assessment, not simple relabeling | Design comparison, risk analysis, testing impact, and whether a new 510(k) may be required |
| Brand or another party is the specification developer | Regulatory responsibility may differ from a basic distributor arrangement | Identify who controls specifications and who must hold/submit the applicable record |
Kopersregel: document the actual business role and actual changes. Do not use the phrase “private label” to collapse distributor, relabeler, specification developer, contractfabrikant, En 510(k) holder into one category.
For any specific launch, have qualified U.S. regulatory counsel or an experienced regulatory professional confirm the final role, etikettering, vermelding, and submission obligations.
Which Changes Require Escalation Before a U.S. Launch?
Escalate any change that could affect intended use, veiligheid, effectiviteit, etikettering, or the cleared technological comparison; do not let commercial approval move faster than the change assessment.
FDA's Premarket-melding 510(k) begeleiding says a new 510(k) is required when a change or modification could significantly affect safety or effectiveness, or when the device is marketed for a new or different intended use. De 510(k) holder is responsible for assessing and documenting changes under the applicable quality-system controls.
Use this escalation gate:
Escalate immediately when the project changes:
- bedoeld gebruik, voorwaarde, user population, behandelgebied, or clinical claim;
- waarschuwingen, contra-indicaties, directions, behandeltijd, or frequency;
- energy source, golflengte architectuur, uitgang, optiek, or emitter layout;
- electrical design, batterij, oplader, controleur, or power supply;
- software, firmware, app-controle, timer, dose logic, or user interface;
- materialen, biocompatible contact components, fit, or mechanical structure;
- accessories that affect use, uitgang, veiligheid, or labeling;
- manufacturing method or supplier in a way that could affect device performance;
- the model identity or family relationship shown in the clearance documents.
Do not make the buyer decide the regulatory outcome alone
The buyer’s task is to identify and document the change, not to invent a legal conclusion from a blog post. Ask the 510(k) holder or responsible manufacturer for the controlled comparison and the documented decision on whether the existing clearance remains applicable or another submission is needed. Then have the launch configuration reviewed in the context of the brand’s actual role and claims.
Which Documents Should You Request Before Approving a Hair-Growth Device?
Request a traceable document set that connects the public FDA record to the exact sample, quotation, label, and planned commercial configuration.
| Document or record | Waarom het ertoe doet | What a useful response contains |
|---|---|---|
| FDA 510(k) database link | Confirms the public record | Live official URL, K-nummer, aanvrager, apparaatnaam, productcode, beslissing |
| Official FDA PDF | Shows decision letter, DE WOLK, and summary where available | Complete file, not cropped pages |
| Cleared-model map | Connects the quotation SKU to the record | Exact model and documented family relationship |
| Current Indications for Use | Sets the starting claim boundary | Exact wording and applicable user/use conditions |
| Current controlled labeling / DE WOLK | Shows warnings, contra-indicaties, directions, and named parties | Document number, herziening, datum, exacte model |
| Private-label role map | Separates manufacturer, houder, distributeur, relabeler, importeur, and specification developer | Legal entity names and regulatory responsibilities |
| Change assessment | Evaluates differences from the cleared configuration | Side-by-side change list, risk/testing impact, goedkeuring, and submission conclusion |
| Product specification and test matrix | Connects the device configuration to verification evidence | Exact model/sample ID, configuratie, report identifiers, herziening, test conditions |
| Laser-radiation compliance file, when applicable | Separates electronic-product radiation obligations from medical-device clearance | Exact-model product or supplemental report, accession number, selected 21 CFR or Laser Notice 56/IEC route, laser class and labels, user information, QC/radiation test records, status van het jaarverslag, FDA 2877/import responsibilities, and reporting timeline |
| Registratie, vermelding, ONS. Agent, and import plan | Covers administrative and entry responsibilities | Correct entities, activities, proprietary names and listings; importer role; medical-device U.S. Agent responsibilities; and the separately designated radiation-product U.S. Agent required for a foreign manufacturer under 21 CFR 1005.25 |
| Complaint and post-market process | Shows how complaints reach the responsible manufacturer | Contacts, tijdlijnen, escalation, record ownership, and reporting responsibilities |
Do not accept “FDA documents available” as a complete answer. A useful response names the file, record number, model, herziening, role, and boundary.
Which FDA Red Flags Should Stop an Approval?
Pause sample, verpakking, claim, or purchase approval when the evidence cannot be traced to the exact project.
Red flags include:
- an “FDA registration certificate,” FDA logo, owner/operator number, or device listing is presented as 510(k) goedkeuring;
- the supplier says “FDA approved” but provides a 510(k) dossier;
- no K number is provided, or the number does not resolve to an official FDA page;
- the record shows a different applicant, and the supplier cannot document the relationship;
- the device name, exacte model, or form factor differs from the product on the quotation;
- the K number belongs to a mask, pain device, paneel, or another product category rather than the hair-growth device being sold;
- the supplier points to a predicate, shared product code, similar wavelength, or same factory as proof of coverage;
- a product-report accession number, IEC report, or laser class label is presented as FDA clearance or approval;
- the device uses lasers, but no exact-model radiation report scope, laser class, etiketten, or supporting quality-control test records can be mapped to the supplied configuration;
- an imported laser product subject to a performance standard lacks the applicable FDA 2877 declaration or certification/identification label; FDA states that covered noncompliant or unlabeled products shall be refused entry;
- an application “in process” is described as already cleared;
- the supplier cannot provide the official PDF, Indicaties voor gebruik, or current controlled labeling;
- the planned packaging adds broader hair-loss, user-population, behandeling, or performance claims;
- hardware, software, accessoires, or protocol were changed without a documented change assessment;
- the supplier says private labeling allows the brand to make any claim it wants.
One red flag does not automatically prove misconduct. It does mean the project is not ready for approval.
Which RFQ Questions Can You Copy?
A useful supplier response should return official links, exact model names, controlled document revisions, role definitions, and change boundaries—not only badges.
| Offerteaanvraagvraag | What a useful answer should contain |
|---|---|
| Is the exact hair-growth device on this quotation FDA 510(k)-gewist, or only registered/listed? | A precise status statement and official database link |
| What is the K number, aanvrager, apparaatnaam, productcode, datum besluit, en besluit? | Fields matching the FDA record |
| Which cleared model is our quoted SKU? | Exact model map, including suffixes and family documents |
| What are the official Indications for Use and OTC/Rx status? | Exact FDA wording and official PDF page |
| Which entity is the 510(k) houder, fabrikant, specification developer, distributeur, importeur, and labeler? | Legal names, activities, and responsibility map |
| Which label wording will identify our brand’s relationship to the manufacturer? | Proposed “Manufactured for” / “Distributed by” wording and labeling review |
| Will our brand name, verpakking, handmatig, waarschuwingen, treatment instructions, or claims change? | Redlined documents and a claim-to-IFU comparison |
| Will the product, accessoires, software, uitgang, materialen, or manufacturing configuration change? | Controlled change list, affected tests, and regulatory assessment |
| Has the 510(k) holder documented whether the changes require a new submission? | Signed/approved change assessment and responsible reviewer |
| Which registration, vermelding, ONS. agent, importeur, UDI, complaint, and reporting responsibilities apply to each party? | Project-specific responsibility table, not a generic compliance promise |
| Can you provide the current specification, labeling/IFU, and relevant verification reports for the exact model? | Controlled files with model, herziening, steekproef, datum, and test identifiers |
| If the device contains lasers, which radiation-product report and compliance route cover the exact model? | Product/supplemental report scope, accession number, selected 21 CFR or Laser Notice 56/IEC route, laser class, etiketten, user information, QC tests, status van het jaarverslag, FDA 2877/import plan, reporting timeline, and radiation-product U.S. Agent where applicable |
Send the questions with the target market, bedoeld gebruik, geplande claims, selected model, verkoopkanaal, and proposed customization. Without that brief, a supplier cannot reliably map the right document set to the project.
What Should a Brand Do Next?
Do not begin with a claim such as “we need an FDA-approved hair cap.” Begin with a project map.
- Write the U.S. intended use and planned claims in plain language.
- Identify the exact supplier model and every planned hardware, software, accessoire, handmatig, verpakking, and branding change.
- Ask for the K number and official FDA PDF.
- Complete the six-link record-to-project map in this guide.
- Request the controlled labeling, model map, role map, and change assessment.
- For a laser product, separately map the exact model to its radiation report, performance-standard route, classification and labels, QC evidence, and import responsibilities.
- Pause unsupported claims and unresolved model relationships.
- Send the final configuration to qualified regulatory review before packaging and market launch.
To review a currently published cap platform, bezoek de HC03 silicone VCSEL laser cap product page en de HC03 sourcing guide. To compare other form factors, hij is bij Wakelife assortiment laser- en LED-haargroeiapparaten en de laser hair-growth comb sourcing guide. These pages support product exploration and project scoping; they do not establish FDA clearance for a model unless an exact official record is separately identified and verified.
If you want Wakelife to prepare a project-specific document request list, send the doelmarkt, bedoeld gebruik, geplande claims, selected model, channel, label role, and customization scope with your inquiry. The first output should be an evidence-gap map—not an unsupported FDA promise.
Veelgestelde vragen
Is FDA-registratie hetzelfde als FDA 510(k) clearance for a hair-growth device?
Nee. Establishment registration and device listing are administrative records. They do not show that FDA cleared, goedgekeurd, or authorized the exact hair-growth device. Ask for the K number and verify it in FDA’s public 510(k) database.
Heeft FDA 510(k) clearance mean the hair-growth device is FDA-approved?
Nee. A substantial-equivalence determination through 510(k) supports the wording “FDA-cleared” or “510(k)-gewist,” not “FDA-approved.” The clearance must still be described within its exact device and use scope.
Does product code OAP prove a hair-growth cap, helmet, or comb is cleared?
Nee. OAP is a generic FDA product classification and a useful database search route. It is not a K number and does not prove that a particular model has clearance. Its generic definition refers to a male androgenetic-alopecia population, but the exact cleared population and use must come from the device’s own Indications for Use.
Does a laser-product report or accession number replace a 510(k)?
Nee. FDA treats electronic-product radiation reporting and applicable medical-device premarket review as separate obligations. An accession number identifies a radiation report received by CDRH; it is not FDA approval and does not establish that the report is adequate. For a laser hair-growth device, verify both the exact-device 510(k) basis and the applicable exact-model laser-radiation file.
Can two devices with the same wavelength use the same 510(k)?
Not on wavelength alone. Clearance is tied to a submitted device comparison that includes intended use and technological characteristics. Model identity, uitgang, optiek, ontwerp, etikettering, waarschuwingen, protocol, software, and other factors may differ.
Is a predicate device’s K number proof that my device is cleared?
Nee. A predicate is part of the submitter’s substantial-equivalence comparison. Its clearance does not transfer to an unlisted third-party device. Your device needs its own applicable legal marketing basis.
Can a private-label distributor sell an unchanged cleared device without its own 510(k)?
Potentieel. FDA says the manufacturer submits the 510(k), if required, when a distributor markets that manufacturer’s product under the distributor’s name. FDA separately addresses domestic distribution and import of a foreign manufacturer’s already-cleared device. The parties must identify the applicable route, accurately state their relationship on the label, and keep the exact device and labeling within the applicable conditions. Changes to intended use, etikettering, device condition, specificaties, or regulatory roles can change the analysis, so the exact project still needs review.
Does a multi-model 510(k) cover new models added later?
Niet automatisch. A record may name several cleared models, but a new or modified model still needs a documented comparison and change assessment. If the change could significantly affect safety or effectiveness or introduces a new intended use, FDA says a new 510(k) may be required.
Are T01-Ultra, HC03, HT01, T02, or C02 FDA-cleared hair-growth devices?
As of this article’s review date, no FDA 510(k) record has been identified for these Wakelife models, so the article does not describe them as FDA-cleared. K250830 belongs to a defined LED-mask family and cannot be used for T01-Ultra, HC03, or another hair-growth device. Buyers should treat model-level clearance as unverified unless Wakelife supplies an exact official record that matches the device, bedoeld gebruik, etikettering, and project configuration.
Samenvatting
The safest way to verify an FDA-cleared hair-growth device is to connect the official record to the commercial project:
K number → applicant → exact device/models → decision → Indications for Use → labeling and planned changes
If any link is missing, the correct sourcing status is unverified, not “probably covered.” Registration, vermelding, a shared product code, the same wavelength, a similar form factor, a predicate, or a factory relationship cannot replace that evidence chain.
For the wider difference between market records, quality systems, elektrische veiligheid, optical testing, en fabrieksachtergrond, ga verder met de Certificeringsgids voor LED-therapieapparaten.
Regelgevende nota: This article is for B2B sourcing education and due diligence. It does not replace FDA advice or project-specific review by qualified U.S. regulatory counsel for a product, entity role, label, claim, change, import arrangement, or private-label launch.
Referenties
-
1
ONS. FDA. Premarket-melding 510(k).
-
2
ONS. FDA. Search the Releasable 510(k) Database.
- 3
-
4
Elektronische code van federale regelgeving. 21 CFR 807.97 — Misbranding by reference to premarket notification.
-
5
ONS. FDA. Product Code OAP — Laser, Comb, Hair.
-
6
ONS. FDA. K250830 510(k) Database Record.
- 7
-
8
ONS. FDA. 510(k) Veelgestelde vragen.
- 9
- 10
-
11
ONS. FDA. OAP Medical-Device Product Classification.
-
12
ONS. FDA. Laserproducten en -instrumenten.
- 13
- 14
-
15
Elektronische code van federale regelgeving. 21 CFR 1040.10 — Laser products En 21 CFR 1040.11 — Specific purpose laser products.
-
16
ONS. FDA. Importing and Exporting Electronic Products.
-
17
Elektronische code van federale regelgeving. 21 CFR 1005.25 — Designation of U.S. Agent for a Foreign Manufacturer.
